The acceptability of intimate partner violence screening and response among refugee women accessing Australian resettlement services

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 18;19(12):e0315061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315061. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Screening and response for intimate partner violence (IPV) is recommended for women in priority populations and is implemented in health services across diverse jurisdictions. Most women experiencing IPV strongly support screening, however this is untested with refugee women in resettlement contexts. Around one third of refugee women in Australia experience IPV and face multiple post-migration challenges. SAHAR (Safety and Health after Arrival) tested IPV screening using the ACTS tool, brief intervention, and referral with women accessing four settlement support services. Women attending sites during the study period were invited to participate in a three month follow up survey with participation by 321/375 women recruited (86%). Acceptability of IPV screening was assessed against (i) levels of comfort with the IPV screening questions and (ii) strength of agreement/disagreement with settlement services asking women about being frightened, controlled or hurt by their partners. Of participants who recalled the screening, 93% reported being very or moderately comfortable with being asked the questions (89% who had experienced IPV; 94% of those with no IPV identified). For all participants, 84% strongly or somewhat agreed with services asking the questions, with no significant difference in agreement between disclosing and non-disclosing groups. Those with no recall of the questions had lower overall agreement and higher disagreement than those who recalled the questions (88% and 10%). Acceptability was not associated with age, country of origin, household composition, time since arrival or number of prior service visits. Participants identified 'care shown by the worker', 'talking to someone in my own language', 'trust in the privacy of the service', and 'talking to a female worker' as the factors most important for encouraging discussion of IPV. High acceptance of IPV screening by refugee women supports consideration of implementation across settlement services, a key access point for refugee women with diverse needs.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Australia
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intimate Partner Violence* / psychology
  • Intimate Partner Violence* / statistics & numerical data
  • Mass Screening*
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care / psychology
  • Refugees* / psychology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Australian Research Council (LP190101183) and SSI, a large non-government agency providing settlement services based in Australia. The Australian Research Council had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. SSI had two chief investigators on the study governance committee who contributed ideas to the study’s implementation, data analysis and preparation of this manuscript, while at all times the University of Wollongong investigators retained full control of study design, implementation, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript.