Length-mass relationships of pond macroinvertebrates do not hold between Southern and Northern Europe

PeerJ. 2024 Dec 16:12:e18576. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18576. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The lack of reliable data on length-mass relationships, essential to obtain accurate biomass estimates, limits our ability to easily assess secondary production by aquatic invertebrates. In the absence of published equations from similar habitat conditions, authors often borrow equations developed in geographic regions with different climate conditions, which may bias biomass estimates. A literature overview of published size-mass relationships for Portugal and Sweden highlights the need for further data within these biogeographic regions. We increased the number of equations available to Southern and Northern Europe, developing 18 new length-mass relationships for two families and 10 genera in Portugal and Sweden. All equations were published for the first time for these countries, except the genus Asellus. Our length-mass relationships were obtained from specimens collected on a one-time sampling of eight ponds in Portugal and five ponds in Sweden during late spring in 2023. Dry mass (DM) was modelled as a function of body length (BL), using the natural log-linear function with a power model (ln DM = ln a + b × ln BL). The equations obtained were compared with linear mixed models testing the fixed effects of "body length" and "country", as well as their interaction. A comparison of the equations developed in this study showed country-specific differences for all taxa, expect the genus Caenis, indicating a low potential transferability of the equations between Southern and Northern Europe. In contrast, the comparison of the equation obtained for A. aquaticus in this study with an equation published for this taxon in Sweden showed great similarities, suggesting a high transferability. Recommending caution in the borrowing of published length-mass equations, that can differ drastically between different geographic and climatic regions, especially at larger sizes, we provide a series of guidelines and good practices in this field.

Keywords: Aquatic insects; Biomass; Freshwaters; Portugal; Secondary production; Size-weight relationships; Sweden.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biomass*
  • Body Size
  • Ecosystem
  • Europe
  • Invertebrates* / physiology
  • Ponds*
  • Portugal
  • Sweden

Grants and funding

This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P./MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC)—PTDC/BIA-BMA/1893/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/PTDC/BIA-BMA/1893/2020). Bruno M Carreira was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P./MCTES through an individual contract awarded under the Scientific Employment Stimulus—CEEIND/02435/2018 (DOI: 10.54499/CEECIND/02435/2018/CP1534/CT0007). Vladimíra Dekanová benefited from a scholarship awarded by the National Scholarship Programme of the Slovak Republic. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.