Insulin clearance at randomisation and in response to treatment in youth with type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of the TODAY randomised clinical trial

Aims/hypothesis: Insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinaemia are core features leading to beta cell failure in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. Insulin clearance (IC) is also a key regulator of insulin concentrations, but few data exist on IC in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. In a secondary analysis of our Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) randomised clinical trial, we investigated potential sex-, race-, ethnicity- and treatment-related differences in IC in youth-onset type 2 diabetes and aimed to identify metabolic phenotypes associated with IC at baseline and in response to metformin, metformin plus a lifestyle intervention, and metformin plus rosiglitazone.

Methods: A total of 640 youth aged 10-18 years with type 2 diabetes underwent fasting blood tests, anthropometric measurements, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to estimate subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) mass, and OGTTs longitudinally over 5 years. IC was calculated from the fasting C-peptide:insulin ratio (fasting IC) and 2 h OGTT C-peptide incremental AUC (iAUC):insulin iAUC ratio (2 h IC). Linear mixed models were used to assess covariate effects on the mean of IC over repeated time points.

Results: Baseline fasting IC (×10^-2 nmol/pmol) was significantly lower in female participants than male participants (median [IQR] 0.72 [0.57-0.93] vs 0.79 [0.63-1.00], respectively; p=0.04) and in non-Hispanic Black participants than Hispanic and non-Hispanic White participants (median [IQR] 0.64 [0.51-0.81] vs 0.78 [0.64-1.00] vs 0.84 [0.68-1.01], respectively; p<0.0001). Similar results were observed for 2 h IC. Lower IC most strongly correlated with higher weight over time (% change [95% CI] in IC per 5 kg increase: fasting IC -1.52 [-2.05, -0.99]; 2 h IC -3.46 [-4.05, -2.86]). Lower IC also correlated with other markers of adiposity (higher BMI and SAT mass), and markers of insulin sensitivity (higher waist:height ratio, VAT mass, VAT:SAT mass ratio, triacylglycerol concentrations, triacylglycerol:HDL-cholesterol ratio, aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] concentrations, and systolic and diastolic BP, and lower HDL-cholesterol and total and high molecular weight adiponectin concentrations) over time. Beta cell function as determined from OGTTs, not insulin sensitivity or IC, was predictive of persistently elevated blood glucose levels. IC was higher with metformin+rosiglitazone than metformin alone (p=0.03 for fasting IC; p=0.02 for 2 h IC) and metformin+lifestyle (2 h IC, p=0.005), but not after adjusting for adiponectin (p value not significant for all).

Conclusions/interpretation: In youth with type 2 diabetes, low IC is correlated with female sex, non-Hispanic Black race and ethnicity, and markers of adiposity and insulin resistance, but not with beta cell function. Along with insulin sensitivity and adiponectin, IC increased in response to rosiglitazone treatment. These findings suggest that, in youth-onset type 2 diabetes, low IC is a compensatory response to changes in insulin sensitivity and/or adiponectin concentrations and is not a mediator of beta cell function.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00081328 DATA AVAILABILITY: Data from the TODAY study (V4; https://doi.org/10.58020/2w6w-pv88 ) reported here are available on request from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Central Repository (NIDDK-CR) Resources for Research ( https://repository.niddk.nih.gov/ ).