Health System Purchasing Professionals' Approaches to Considering Equity in Procurement

Katrina E Hauschildt; Taylor Bernstein; Deidra C Crews; Emmanuel F Drabo; Kadija Ferryman; John W Jackson; Thomas S Valley; Joseph Levy; Theodore J Iwashyna

doi:10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.016

Health System Purchasing Professionals' Approaches to Considering Equity in Procurement

Chest. 2024 Dec 19:S0012-3692(24)05718-0. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.016. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Katrina E Hauschildt¹, Taylor Bernstein², Deidra C Crews³, Emmanuel F Drabo⁴, Kadija Ferryman⁵, John W Jackson⁶, Thomas S Valley⁷, Joseph Levy⁴, Theodore J Iwashyna³

Affiliations

¹ School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
² School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
³ School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Center for Health Equity, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
⁴ School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
⁵ School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Berman Institute for Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
⁶ School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Center for Health Equity, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
⁷ School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

PMID: 39708960
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.016

Abstract

Background: Continuing data on racial bias in pulse oximeters and artificial intelligence has sparked calls for health systems to drive innovation against racial bias in healthcare device and artificial intelligence markets by incorporating equity concerns explicitly into purchasing decisions.

Research question: How do healthcare purchasing professionals integrate equity concerns into purchasing decision-making?

Study design and methods: Between 8/2023-3/2024, we conducted semi-structured interviews via videoconferencing with healthcare purchasing professionals about purchasing processes for pulse oximeters and other devices-and whether and where equity concerns arise in decision-making. An abductive approach was used to analyze perspectives on how equity and disparity concerns are currently integrated into healthcare purchasing decision-making. Healthcare purchasing professionals (N=30) worked in varied supply chain roles for various health systems and supply chain support and consulting companies across the US.

Results: Healthcare purchasing professionals described limited considerations of equity in current purchasing processes. They described some receptivity to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, largely focused on diversifying suppliers, rather than ensuring devices and products functioned equitably. Respondents reported that they depended on clinician partners to raise and delineate requirements for equitable performance. Respondents also depicted current sources of evidence used in making purchasing decisions as providing limited information about equitable performance, and that large contracts, including with group purchasing organizations (GPOs), may limit purchasing options.

Interpretation: Health system purchasing professionals suggested interest and some nascent successes in diversity, equity, and inclusion considerations in health system purchasing processes, including diverse supplier initiatives, but also a need for strong clinical partnership to ensure equitable performance. Explicit approaches for incorporating equitable performance into healthcare purchasing are likely needed.