Tobacco susceptibility and use among rural adolescents: The role of tobacco marketing exposure and screen media use

Sunny Jung Kim; Kendall Fugate-Laus; Jeremy Barsell; Elizabeth K Do; Rashelle B Hayes; Bernard F Fuemmeler

doi:10.1093/ntr/ntae309

Tobacco susceptibility and use among rural adolescents: The role of tobacco marketing exposure and screen media use

Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Dec 24:ntae309. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae309. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Sunny Jung Kim^{1

2}, Kendall Fugate-Laus³, Jeremy Barsell⁴, Elizabeth K Do⁵, Rashelle B Hayes⁶, Bernard F Fuemmeler^{2

4}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
² Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
³ Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
⁴ Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
⁵ Schroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.
⁶ Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

PMID: 39716391
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae309

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco marketing has been found to increase pro-tobacco attitudes and susceptibilities; yet its impact on rural adolescents lacks research. We aim to examine the association between tobacco marketing exposure, screen use, and susceptibility and use of tobacco among a rural youth sample.

Methods: Youth (N = 697) enrolled in grades 9-11 that resided in rural counties in Virginia were recruited to participate in a survey in September 2022. We assessed demographics, tobacco use, susceptibility to tobacco use, screen media use, and exposure to tobacco marketing and warning messages.

Results: One in five (n= 144, 20.66%) participants reported using any tobacco products and 394 (56.53%) indicated susceptibility. High engagement in social media and texting were more likely to be tobacco ever-users than those who had low engagement with those screen media, X2(1) = 12.00 and X2(1) = 19.40, respectively (ps <.001). Greater exposure to pro-tobacco marketing on social media (OR: 2.03, 95% CI [1.37 - 3.03]) and higher-grade level (OR: 1.77, 95% CI [1.29 - 2.43]) were significantly associated with a greater likelihood of reporting "ever-use" of tobacco products, while controlling for mother's education, gender, and ethnicity. Among adolescents who never used tobacco products, a higher-grade level was associated with greater susceptibility to initiating tobacco product use (OR: 1.40, 95% CI [1.05 - 1.86]).

Conclusions: In this rural sample, greater social media/text use and exposure to pro-tobacco marketing on social media were significantly associated with tobacco ever use. Identification of these risk factors can help inform potential targets and timing for future tobacco prevention campaigns for rural youth.

Implications: Screen media use, tobacco marketing/warning exposure, and their associations with tobacco use and susceptibility were examined in a study with 697 rural Virginia youth. Heavy socia.

Keywords: e-cigarettes; media exposure; rural youth; smoking; tobacco products.

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].