Background/Objectives: The integration of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing into primary care has not been widely implemented, despite its benefits for patients and providers. PGx testing could also reduce health disparities as patients with lower healthcare access are prescribed higher proportions of medications with PGx guidelines. Little is known about the preferences of patients who have experienced PGx testing to inform implementation across the care process. This qualitative study aimed to refine implementation by capturing patient preferences on (1) testing and prescription timing, (2) patient-clinician discussion of results during post-test counseling, and (3) usability of a card during results dissemination. Methods: Interviews were conducted with 25 primary care patients from clinics primarily serving medically underserved populations. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed using a constant comparative approach. Results: While patients supported both reactive and pre-emptive testing, they valued pre-emptive PGx testing because it is proactive for future health needs, expedites treatment, and is convenient. Patients' preferences for receiving prescriptions depended on several factors: having immediate access to needed medications, avoiding experiencing medication side effects and interactions, avoiding taking ineffective medications, and avoiding inconveniences. Patients identified three issues critical to patient-clinician interactions when receiving testing results: information specific to medications, clarification and further information about their results, and enhanced clinician accessibility related to the results. Lastly, they liked that the results card could facilitate discussions with clinicians and was informative and convenient but said it lacked clarity. Conclusions: These findings should inform implementation strategies for integrating PGx testing in primary care for underserved patients.
Keywords: implementation; patient preferences; pharmacogenetic testing; primary care.