Validity and Reliability of the Videoconference-Based Berg Balance Scale in Stroke Survivors: The Tele-Berg Balance Scale

Aline Barbosa da Costa; Bruno Freire; Tayara Gaspar da Silva; Stella Maris Michaelsen

doi:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000506

Validity and Reliability of the Videoconference-Based Berg Balance Scale in Stroke Survivors: The Tele-Berg Balance Scale

J Neurol Phys Ther. 2024 Dec 27. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000506. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Aline Barbosa da Costa¹, Bruno Freire, Tayara Gaspar da Silva, Stella Maris Michaelsen

Affiliation

¹ Department of Physical Therapy, Motor Control Laboratory (LADECOM), Centre of Healthy and Sport Sciences, University of Santa Catarina State, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

PMID: 39737813
DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000506

Abstract

Background and purpose: Telerehabilitation represents an alternative for individuals who have difficulty accessing services to receive care. Therefore, telerehabilitation measures must be studied for their reliability and validity. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the videoconference-based Berg Balance Scale assessment in stroke survivors.

Methods: Thirty-one stroke survivors were assessed. Rater A conducted in-person and remote assessments via videoconferencing at 2 different times (test-retest), and rater B conducted an assessment using the second recording made remotely. The validity and agreement between the in-person and remote assessments were analyzed using the Pearson's correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman plots limits of agreement (LoA), respectively. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and individual item reliability was assessed by weighted Kappa. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were computed. Cronbach's alpha was used for the analysis of internal consistency, and the ceiling effect was investigated.

Results: In-person and remote assessments showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.96) and less than a 1-point difference between the 2 assessments. Both the test-retest (ICC = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.97) reliability were excellent. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were 1.8 and 5.1 points, respectively. Results showed adequate internal consistency and no ceiling effect.

Discussion and conclusions: The Tele-Berg demonstrated validity, excellent test-retest and inter-rater reliability, low measurement error, adequate internal consistency, and lack of ceiling effect. These findings suggest that the Tele-Berg is comparable to in-person Berg Balance Scale in stroke survivors.

Video abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Supplemental Digital Content, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A509).