We highlight the potential for further analysis and investigation of the article by Sirakaya and colleagues. Specifically, we note that the authors failed to evaluate diaphragm mobility, which is essential for a comprehensive assessment of respiratory function, as well as diaphragm thickness. Assessing diaphragm mobility could enrich our understanding of the impact of surgical approaches on respiratory mechanics and postoperative pulmonary complications. Additionally, we note the absence of socioeconomic status (SES) as a confounding factor in the study. Recognizing the influence of SES on surgical outcomes and patient recovery, we suggest its inclusion in future research. We also emphasize the importance of integrating a multidisciplinary team, including physiotherapists and social workers, to address the physical and socioeconomic challenges faced by patients post-surgery.
© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.