Comparing cup placement, leg length, and offset discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty between CT-based robotic arm-assisted and navigation systems

Akira Shimizu; Satoshi Murakami; Takayuki Tamai; Yuuki Haga; Tatsuhiko Kutsuna; Tomofumi Kinoshita; Masaki Takao

doi:10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0173.R1

Comparing cup placement, leg length, and offset discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty between CT-based robotic arm-assisted and navigation systems

Bone Jt Open. 2025 Jan 1;6(1):3-11. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0173.R1.

Authors

Akira Shimizu¹, Satoshi Murakami¹, Takayuki Tamai¹, Yuuki Haga¹, Tatsuhiko Kutsuna², Tomofumi Kinoshita², Masaki Takao²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ozu Memorial Hospital, Ozu, Japan.
² Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.

PMID: 39740687
PMCID: PMC11688127
DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0173.R1

Abstract

Aims: Excellent outcomes have been reported following CT-based robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) compared with manual THA; however, its superiority over CT-based navigation THA (nTHA) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether a CT-based robotic arm-assisted system helps surgeons perform accurate cup placement, minimizes leg length, and offsets discrepancies more than a CT-based navigation system.

Methods: We studied 60 hips from 54 patients who underwent rTHA between April 2021 and August 2023, and 45 hips from 44 patients who underwent nTHA between January 2020 and March 2021 with the same target cup orientation at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at Ozu Memorial Hospital, Japan. After propensity score matching, each group had 37 hips. Postoperative acetabular component position and orientation were measured using the planning module of the CT-based navigation system. Postoperative leg length and offset discrepancies were evaluated using postoperative CT in patients who have unilateral hip osteoarthritis.

Results: The absolute differences in radiological inclination (RI) and radiological anteversion (RA) from the target were significantly smaller in rTHA (RI 1.2° (SD 1.2°), RA 1.4° (SD 1.2°)) than in nTHA (RI 2.7° (SD 1.9°), RA 3.0° (SD 2.6°)) (p = 0.005 for RI, p = 0.002 for RA). The absolute distance of the target's postoperative centre of rotation was significantly smaller in the mediolateral (ML) and superoinferior (SI) directions in rTHA (ML 1.1 mm (SD 0.8), SI 1.3 mm (SD 0.5)) than in nTHA (ML 1.9 mm (SD 0.9), SI 1.6 mm (SD 0.9)) (p = 0.002 for ML, p = 0.042 for SI). Absolute leg length and absolute discrepancies in the acetabular, femoral, and global offsets were significantly lower in the rTHA group than in the nTHA group (p = 0.042, p = 0.004, p = 0.003, and p = 0.010, respectively). In addition, the percentage of hips significantly differed with an absolute global offset discrepancy of ≤ 5 mm (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: rTHA is more accurate in cup orientation and position than nTHA, effectively reducing postoperative leg length and offset discrepancy.