Sorafenib promotes Treg cell differentiation to compromise its efficacy via VEGFR/AKT/Foxo1 signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma

Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Dec 30:101454. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2024.101454. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Our study revealed that sorafenib (Sora) induced the formation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by promoting the differentiation of regulatory T (Treg) cells through VEGFR/AKT/Foxo1 signaling, leading to compromised Sora efficacy. Importantly, combination treatment with an anti-CD25 antibody or the Foxo1 inhibitor AS1842856 inhibited Treg cell differentiation and increased the therapeutic efficacy of Sora in HCC.

Background & aims: Sora is the first-line drug for advanced HCC. However, acquired resistance to Sora treatment largely hinders its therapeutic efficacy, and the mechanisms underlying Sora resistance remain poorly understood. Here, we revealed a new mechanism by which Sora promotes the differentiation of Treg cells to suppress the immune response in the HCC tumor microenvironment (TME) and induce Sora resistance.

Methods: Human liver tissues were obtained from HCC patients. Female C57BL/6J, OT-II, and Foxp3GFP mice were also utilized. Flow cytometry was used to analyze immune cells in TME. Flow cytometry, real-time PCR and ELISA were performed to evaluate Treg cell differentiation. Immunoblotting was conducted to identify relevant proteins. Mouse and human tumor tissues were evaluated via multiplex immunofluorescence staining. Sora-treated HCC tissues and Sora-treated Treg cells were subjected to RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis. Tumor models were generated and treated with Sora, Sora combined with an anti-CD25 antibody, or Sora combined with the Foxo1 inhibitor AS1842856.

Results: First, we found through bioinformatic analysis that Sora suppresses the immune response in HCC. Furthermore, Sora increased the Treg cell population to promote the formation of an immunosuppressive TME in HCC. In vitro, Sora promoted Treg cell differentiation and increased the immunosuppressive activity of Treg cells. Activating VEGF and AKT abolished the effect of Sora on Treg cell differentiation, whereas inhibiting Foxo1 compromised Sora-induced Treg cell differentiation, indicating that the induction of Treg cells by Sora is dependent on the VEGFR/AKT/Foxo1 pathway. Finally, Treg inactivation by an anti-CD25 antibody or the Foxo1 inhibitor AS1842856 in combination with Sora showed greater efficacy in the treatment of HCC.

Conclusion: Sora induced Treg cell differentiation by inhibiting VEGFR/AKT signaling and activating Foxo1, thus suppressing the immune response and reducing Sora efficacy. Treg inactivation might be a promising strategy to alleviate the immunosuppressive TME and overcome Sora resistance.

Keywords: Foxo1; Sora resistance; Treg cells; hepatocellular carcinoma; immunosuppression.