Implant waste and associated costs in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review

Int Orthop. 2025 Jan 4. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06397-w. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Purpose: Trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) surgery relies on medical implants and materials, often resulting in metalwork wastage (prosthesis, screws, nails, and plates). This places an economic strain on healthcare services and the environment. Our primary outcome is to quantify the implant wastage across the literature, and secondarily investigate the associated costs in this specialty.

Methods: A literature search of three databases (Scopus, PubMed and Embase) was performed using MeSH terms relating to "implant waste" and "trauma and orthopaedic surgery", from January 1980 to November 2023. We included any observational studies that reported patients undergoing T&O surgery, where the wastage or associated costs was reported.

Results: Our search returned 2,145 articles, of which 15 met the final inclusion criteria, encompassing 26,832 procedures. Nine studies reported the extent and cost of waste, six reported the weight of waste and ten concurrently reported the cost. Implant waste events occurred in up to 30% of all T&O procedures, being the most likely to occur in fracture fixation, and cost hospitals between $4,130 and $189,628.41 annually. Screws were the most wasted material, followed by plates and nails. Up to 95% of waste events were caused by human factors.

Conclusion: Despite the limited number of studies, there is an economic burden and environmental footprint in T&O surgery services. The main factors contributing to the waste was human error, and contamination. Further research is required to determine methods of mitigating and limiting implant waste in T&O Surgery.

Keywords: Hospital costs; Implant waste; Metalwork; T&O; Trauma and orthopaedic surgery.

Publication types

  • Review