Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the sex-specific influence of expected exercise duration on the physiological responses to RPE-clamp exercise anchored to RPE 15 with participants being deceived into believing the RPE-clamp exercise would last for 20-, 30-, or 40-min, but all trials were 30-min.
Methods: Twelve males and 12 females completed a graded exercise test followed by randomly ordered RPE-clamp trials at RPE15 on the Borg 6-20 scale where subjects were deceived into expecting exercise to last for either 20-, 30-, or 40-min, but the actual duration for each trial was 30-min. Separate 2 (Sex [Male vs. Female]) × 3 (Deception [20-min, 30-min, 40-min]) × 11 (Time [0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30 min]) mixed model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with appropriate follow-up ANOVAs, and Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons, were used to examine changes in volume of oxygen uptake ( ), heart rate (HR), respiration rate (RR), power output, and muscle oxygen saturation (%SmO2).
Results: Females, but not males, demonstrated lower power outputs when expected duration was 40-min compared to 20-min after approximately half of the exercise bout. , regardless of Sex, was also lower when expected duration was 40-min (62.47 ± 5.59% ) compared to 20-min (66.35 ± 5.79% ). There was no effect of expected duration on HR, RR, or %SmO2, but females demonstrated significantly higher HR (86.06 ± 5.93%HRmax) and RR (74.81 ± 7.26%RRmax) compared to males (79.52 ± 4.96%HRmax; 62.31 ± 5.80%RRmax).
Conclusions: RPE-clamp exercise performance in females, but not males, may be influenced by the expectation of exercise duration.
Keywords: Deception; Endurance exercise; Rating of perceived exertion; Sex differences; Teleoanticipation.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.