At-Home Care Program for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction Phase in Patients Treated with Venetoclax-Based Low-Intensity Regimens

Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 23;16(24):4274. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244274.

Abstract

Background: Even though venetoclax in combination with azacitidine (VenAza) is considered a low-intensity regimen, its patients present a high incidence of cytopenia and infections during the first courses, making the initial management a challenging phase. Methods: This difficulty in our center led to the establishment of an At-Home (AH) program for ramp-up and follow-up patients during the VenAza combination induction phase focused on therapy administration, patient and caregiver education, and management of adverse events (AEs). A total of 70 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML) or relapsed/refractory AML (R/R AML) were treated with VenAza from March 2019 to May 2022. We compared outcomes between patients managed with a hospital-based (inpatient) approach and those managed through the AH program. Results: Despite most patients experiencing grade 3-4 cytopenias (96.9%), the incidence of serious infections and other AEs was comparable between both groups, with no significant difference in febrile neutropenia (42.3% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.38). Overall, the AH cohort demonstrated a significantly lower hospital readmission rate after ramp-up (29.5% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.001). Moreover, the inpatient cohort's admission days were longer than in the AH cohort (13 vs. 8, p = 0.28). Conclusions: AH management was feasible and safe, leading to better resource use, enhanced patient comfort, and improved treatment compliance. The potential of AH programs for managing low-intensity chemotherapy regimens can reduce hospital admissions and subsequently improve patient and caregiver well-being.

Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia; at-home management; azacitidine; hypomethylating agents; patient education; venetoclax.

Grants and funding

This at-home program was funded by an unrestricted grant by AbbVie Spain Pharmaceuticals. The funders had no role in the design of the study, collection of the data, or analysis and interpretation of the data, nor any part of manuscript preparation.