Lung Ultrasound in Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Narrative Review of the Last 10 Years

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 12;14(24):2793. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14242793.

Abstract

Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a common and potentially life-threatening condition in preterm infants, primarily due to surfactant deficiency. Early and accurate diagnosis is critical to guide timely interventions such as surfactant administration and respiratory support. Traditionally, chest X-rays have been used for diagnosis, but lung ultrasound (LUS) has gained prominence due to its non-invasive, radiation-free, and bedside applicability. Compared to chest X-rays and CT scans, LUS demonstrates superior sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing RDS, particularly in identifying surfactant need and predicting CPAP failure. Additionally, LUS offers real-time imaging without radiation exposure, an advantage over other modalities. However, its broader adoption is limited by challenges in standardizing training, ensuring diagnostic reproducibility, and validating scoring systems, especially in resource-limited settings. This narrative review aims to evaluate the role of LUS in the diagnosis and management of neonatal RDS over the past decade, focusing on its clinical utility, scoring systems, and emerging applications. We reviewed the literature from 2013 to 2023, focusing on studies evaluating LUS' diagnostic accuracy, scoring systems, and its potential role in guiding surfactant therapy and predicting CPAP failure. Despite its benefits, addressing the variability in operator expertise and integrating artificial intelligence to enhance usability are crucial for ensuring LUS' efficacy across diverse clinical environments. Future research should prioritize standardizing training and scoring protocols to facilitate wider implementation and optimize neonatal respiratory care outcomes.

Keywords: lung ultrasound; lung ultrasound score; neonates; respiratory distress syndrome; surfactant therapy.

Publication types

  • Review

Grants and funding

This review received no external funding. The costs for the publication of the manuscript will be covered by the Pediatric Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.