Evaluating the Equivalency of Teletesting and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Measures of Reading Achievement in a Clinically Referred Sample

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to build an evidence base to support teletesting as an equivalent modality for standardized neuropsychological assessment. As such, the purpose of this study was twofold. First, this study evaluated teletesting equivalency of standardized reading achievement measures during COVID-19 in children ages 6-16. Further, to examine the impact of COVID-19 on reading, achievement scores were compared in two samples of children assessed before and during COVID-19.

Methods: Participants were referred for testing at an outpatient neuropsychology clinic at an urban, academic medical center. Aim one compared assessments administered in-person (n = 1039) versus teletesting (n = 283). A two one-sided test (TOST) was used to determine equivalency. Aim two compared children seen pre-COVID-19 (n = 2125) and during COVID-19 (n = 1322) including a subsample of elementary school-aged children. One-way analyses of covariance were employed, with insurance type and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition Matrix Reasoning (as a proxy for nonverbal IQ) included as covariates.

Results: Results showed equivalence in reading achievement scores administered via teletesting compared to in-person during COVID-19. For aim two, Nonsense Word Decoding scores were significantly higher for the COVID-19 group compared to the pre-COVID-19 group (p = 0.03). No other significant differences in reading scores were found between groups, including no differences among a subsample of elementary school-aged children (ages 6-10; all ps > 0.05).

Conclusions: This provides additional support for teletesting equivalency and suggests the negative impact of COVID-19 on foundational reading skills is less than predicted in a clinically referred sample.