A systematic review of interventions targeting Anopheles stephensi

Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 16:9:724. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23480.1. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: Anopheles stephensi, a malaria mosquito originally from South Asia and the Middle East, has been expanding across both Asia and Africa in recent decades. The invasion of this species into sub-Saharan Africa is of particular concern given its potential to increase malaria burden, especially in urban environments where An. stephensi thrives. Whilst surveillance of this vector in Africa has recently increased markedly there is a need to review the existing methods of An. stephensi control so that we can stop, rather than simply monitor, its spread in Africa.

Methods: We searched published papers in PubMed using An. stephensi and intervention-specific search terms. Forty-five full-text articles were screened for eligibility and all those that reported the use of interventions against An. stephensi, and the effect on malaria incidence, malaria prevalence or vector densities were included in the analysis. All data retrieved from the literature were from the native range of An. stephensi and from the period 1995 to 2018.

Results: Fourteen studies which met the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. The vector control interventions discussed were bio larvicides (n=3), repellents (n=1), Indoor Residual Spraying (n=2), Insecticide Treated Nets (n=3), insecticide-treated materials other than nets (n=3), the combined use of repellents and mosquito nets (n=1), and combination of biolarvicide and fish (n=1). Outcomes of the studies were primarily vector density (n=10) although some reported malaria incidence and/or prevalence (n=4).

Conclusions: Long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying are effective in controlling, An. stephensi-transmitted malaria and reducing vector density, with repellents offering a complementary approach, especially in urban areas where this vector thrives. The private sector can help scale up affordable repellent production in Africa. There is a need to address gaps in cost-effectiveness analysis and gather more epidemiological evidence to better assess the impact of malaria control strategies.

Keywords: An. stephensi; malaria; mosquito densities; vector control tools.

Plain language summary

The malaria mosquito vector Anopheles stephensi, originally from South Asia and the Middle East, has recently spread to Africa particularly in sub-Saharan areas, where it could increase the malaria burden in cities. While detection of this mosquito in Africa has improved, new strategies are needed to control its spread, not only monitor its impact. We reviewed studies published between 1995 and 2018 following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fourteen studies met the criteria and looked at control methods such as larvicides (3 studies), repellents (1 study), indoor residual spraying (2 studies), mosquito nets (3 studies), insecticide-treated materials other than nets (3 studies) and combinations of some of these interventions (2 studies). Most of the studies focused on reducing mosquito populations and a few looked at the impact on malaria cases. Insecticide-treated nets and indoor spraying were shown to be effective against An. stephensi malaria transmission. Repellents could also help, particularly in urban areas where the mosquito thrives. The private sector could support access to affordable repellents in Africa. More research is needed to understand how effective and affordable these malaria control tools could be within communities in Africa.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.27926556.v1

Grants and funding

This work was supported by Wellcome [220870/Z/20/Z]; and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) using the UK’s Official Development Assistance (ODA) Funding. The funders had no role in study design data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Wellcome, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.