Topical erythromycin v clindamycin therapy for acne. A multicenter, double-blind comparison

Arch Dermatol. 1984 Mar;120(3):351-5. doi: 10.1001/archderm.120.3.351.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of topical 1.5% erythromycin solution and 1% clindamycin phosphate solution were compared in the treatment of acne. The number of inflammatory lesions was significantly reduced at 12 weeks by 62% and 59% and the number of noninflammatory lesions by 43% and 39% in the erythromycin and clindamycin groups, respectively. The reduction in lesions was also reflected in the clinical evaluation of the overall facial condition; 73% of the 74 patients treated with erythromycin solution and 62% of the 80 patients treated with clindamycin solution had excellent or good responses at 12 weeks. The results of this study show that topically applied 1.5% erythromycin and 1.0% clindamycin solutions are both effective and comparable in reducing the clinical manifestation of acne in patients with moderate disease.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Acne Vulgaris / drug therapy*
  • Administration, Topical
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Child
  • Clindamycin / administration & dosage*
  • Clindamycin / adverse effects
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Erythromycin / administration & dosage*
  • Erythromycin / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Melanosis / chemically induced
  • Middle Aged
  • Multi-Institutional Systems
  • Paresthesia / chemically induced
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Clindamycin
  • Erythromycin