Background: In the case of prostate carcinoma, radiation therapy is a locally applied treatment modality in a malignancy known for systemic dissemination. Because significant efforts and resources currently are being consumed to improve local tumor control, failure patterns and potential curative gain deserve appropriate assessment.
Methods: From 1975-1989, 647 patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma were definitively irradiated for biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Failure patterns were examined, and survival advantage based on improvement in either local or distant disease control was calculated. Distant metastatic rate and cause-specific survival analyses were used as parameters by which to compare the outcome for patients in whom local tumor control was achieved with patients who experienced local failure, thereby assessing further the importance of the effectiveness of locally applied therapy.
Results: Three hundred ninety-two (61%) patients at the time of this writing were clinically disease free. Sixty-two (10%) patients failed locally only, 133 (20%) distantly only, and 60 (9%) developed local and distant recurrent disease. Both local and distant failure rates were higher in patients with more advanced stage lesions at presentation, and distant failure rates significantly increased in patients with less differentiated tumors. Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen was found to be useful in predicting recurrence patterns. Overall, there appeared to be more potential for improvement in survival secondary to reducing distant metastasis. The distant survival advantage (DSA) of reducing distant metastases, compared with the local survival advantage (LSA) of improving local tumor control, was 26 versus 14%. Although DSA was greater than LSA within each stage category, the potential to improve survival was most significant in the Stage C group, where DSA was 35% and LSA 16%. Although LSA varied little according to tumor grade, DSA was dependent on tumor grade and varied from 13% for well differentiated lesions to 38% for poorly differentiated lesions. Distant failure free survival at 10 years was 63% for patients with local control and 45% for those with local failure (P = 0.01). Similarly, 10-year cause-specific survival was 75% in locally controlled patients compared with 48% for those with local recurrence (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Although better local tumor control should translate into at least modest survival gain for patients with prostate carcinoma, additional advantage may be seen with improved systemic therapy or perhaps earlier diagnosis to reduce further the distant metastasis rate.