Ischemic zone refractoriness and conduction delay respond differently to infarct healing and, hypothetically, may exert discordant influences on the electrophysiologic action of different classes of antiarrhythmic drugs. This study evaluated the influence of infarct healing on the electrophysiologic effects of procainamide (PA) and N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) in a sedated, closed-chest canine model with a healing anterior wall myocardial infarction, indwelling myocardial electrodes and inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT). Infarct zone refractory periods, conduction times and the inducibility of VT were tested at base line and during infusion of PA or NAPA in a crossover study design at 1, 4 and 8 weeks of infarct healing. Data were presented as the percent magnitude of change from base line induced by drug. The magnitude of change during PA infusion in infarct zone refractory periods, but not conduction times, decreased during infarct healing (P < .001). The magnitude of change in refractory period and conduction time during NAPA was not significantly altered by the stage of myocardial infarction healing. At week 1, PA prevented inducible VT in 9 of 14 animals vs. 3 of 15 during NAPA infusion (P < .05). At weeks 4 and 8 there was no significant difference in VT suppression between PA and NAPA. We conclude that the stage of infarct healing can selectively influence the response of the infarct zone to the effects of PA, but not NAPA. This discordant effect may be class-specific. These data may have important implications for the management of lethal ventricular arrhythmias soon after myocardial infarction.