5-ASA enema versus oral sulphasalazine in maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis

Ital J Gastroenterol. 1994 Apr;26(3):121-5.

Abstract

This prospective trial in patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of biweekly high-dose 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) enemas (4g/100ml) in maintaining a remission recently induced using daily 5-ASA enemas. Thirty-one patients were randomly assigned, 16 to 5-ASA and 15 to oral sulphasalazine (2g/day), and examined monthly. Sigmoidoscopy was performed "blind" at six months or at clinical relapse. Twelve patients on 5-ASA (75%) and nine on sulphasalazine (60%) remained in clinical and endoscopic remission throughout the study (NS), and the survival curve for 5-ASA was better at all points (NS). No patient stopped therapy due to side effects, and all those on 5-ASA chose to continue rectal maintenance therapy after the study. It was concluded that biweekly 5-ASA enemas is at least as effective as oral sulphasalazine in maintaining remission in unselected patients whose remission has been achieve using local therapy.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Aminosalicylic Acids / administration & dosage*
  • Aminosalicylic Acids / therapeutic use
  • Colitis, Ulcerative / drug therapy*
  • Colitis, Ulcerative / epidemiology
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Enema
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mesalamine
  • Prospective Studies
  • Recurrence
  • Sulfasalazine / administration & dosage*
  • Sulfasalazine / therapeutic use
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Aminosalicylic Acids
  • Sulfasalazine
  • Mesalamine