[Influence of various therapeutic models on survival after prehospital cardiac arrest]

Ugeskr Laeger. 1993 Jun 21;155(25):1953-8.
[Article in Danish]

Abstract

We analyzed the outcome after prehospital cardiac arrest in a part of greater Copenhagen. Four different emergency medical systems were acting: a system providing basic life support only (group 1), a system providing basic life support and early defibrillation (group 2), a system providing basic life support followed by advanced cardiac life support (group 3), and a system providing basic life support and early defibrillation followed by advanced cardiac life support (group 4). Over a 2-year period 624 cases of cardiac arrest were reported, 34 were discharged from hospital. The survival to discharge from hospital and the one-year survival were significantly better in group 4. Our data reconfirm that early advanced cardiac life support improves survival rates for prehospital cardiac arrest.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
  • Electric Countershock
  • Emergency Medical Services / methods*
  • Female
  • Heart Arrest / mortality*
  • Heart Arrest / therapy
  • Humans
  • Life Support Care
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies