[Evaluation system in assessing radiological examinations of clinical significance for the patient]

Rofo. 1996 Jan;164(1):42-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015606.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test a scoring system and its utility for the assessment of the clinical significance of radiological examinations.

Material and methods: The reports of all diagnostic studies obtained in patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatitis, urinary tract obstruction, biliary or gallbladder diseases, ileus and gastrointestinal perforation were scored prospectively in 4 categories from 0 to 3. These categories were related to the ability to establish a definite diagnosis, to exclude suspected disease, to influence further diagnostic work-up and therapeutic decision-making.

Results: This scoring system showed significant differences of the efficacy of different imaging modalities in these 5 clinical settings.

Conclusion: This scoring system was helpful to determine the clinical significance of radiological examinations.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biliary Tract Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Emergencies
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Gastrointestinal Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pancreatitis / diagnostic imaging
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality Control
  • Radiography* / standards
  • Urologic Diseases / diagnostic imaging