121 patients with advanced ovarian cancer resistant to or relapsing following platinum-based chemotherapy participated in this prospective randomised multicenter study. The second-line treatment was indicated according to the relapse-free interval. 36 assessable patients were resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy or relapsed within 12 months following primary surgery. This group of patients with early relapse was randomized to oral or parenteral etoposide. 82 patients relapsed within an interval longer then 12 months following primary surgery; these patients with delayed relapse underwent a secondary tumour-debulking surgery. The data of this group of patients with delayed relapse will be published as soon as the time of observation allows adequate results. In this paper the efficiency of etoposide in the patients with early relapse is analysed according to the application form of the drug (oral vs. parenteral). No statistically significant difference in response rate, toxicity, and median survival time was found between the oral (n = 18) and parenteral (n = 18) treatment. In both application groups the response rate was 22%, the median survival time 14 and 13 months respectively. Alopecia and leucopenia were the most frequent toxicities. As a result etoposide is efficient in unfavorable ovarian cancer patients with early relapse. Because of better compliance etoposide should be administered parenterally. In respect of response rate and median survival time, etoposide is comparable with paclitaxel.