Purpose: To correlate prospective imaging findings in patients with intractable partial epilepsy with site of surgery and clinical outcome.
Materials and methods: Thirty-five patients (25 male, 10 female) underwent positron emission tomography (PET; n=25), interictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT; n=33), or postictal SPECT (n=23) for localization of epileptogenic foci. The standard of reference was site of surgery.
Results: Sensitivity was 60%, 61%, and 52%; positive predictive value was 83%, 71%, and 55%; and localization was incorrect in 12% (three of 25 cases), 24% (eight of 33 cases), and 43% (10 of 23 cases) in PET, interictal SPECT, and postictal SPECT, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in localization capabilities in a comparison of interictal SPECT and PET (correct localization, P=.999; incorrect localization, P=.625). There was a trend toward higher incorrect localization with interictal SPECT.
Conclusion: Postictal SPECT has low sensitivity and a high incorrect localization rate and should not be performed in these patients. Interictal SPECT with 6-8-mm full-width at half-maximum is an alternative to PET. However, the trend toward higher false-localization rates must be taken into consideration.