Antiarrhythmic and electrophysiologic effects of intravenous ibutilide and sotalol in the canine sterile pericarditis model

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 Feb;7(2):113-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00506.x.

Abstract

Introduction: Atrial arrhythmias are a frequent clinical complication following open heart surgery. We compared the Class III agents d,l-so-talol and ibutilide fumarate in an intravenous cross-over study using the canine atrial sterile pericarditis model.

Methods and results: We studied pacing-induced sustained atrial flutter over a 7-day post-surgical period in conscious dogs, alternating analysis of ibutilide (1.0 to 30.0 micrograms/kg) and d,l-sotalol (0.1 to 3.0 mg/kg). Ibutilide significantly increased atrial flutter cycle length (AFL CL) 11 +/- 2 msec and atrial effective refractory period (AERP) 13 +/- 2 msec, and terminated atrial flutter in all cases (n = 12) following a mean dose of 6 +/- 2 micrograms/kg. Plasma concentrations of ibutilide were 53 +/- 13 ng/mL. Ventricular effective refractory period (VERP) was not significantly affected (4 +/- 2 msec). Following termination with ibutilide, atrial flutter could be reinitiated in 1 of 12 trials, and was nonsustained (40-sec duration). Sotalol significantly increased AFL CL 23 +/- 3 msec and terminated atrial flutter in 8 of 12 trials following a mean dose of 1.5 +/- 0.4 mg/kg. AERP and VERP were significantly increased 20 +/- 6 and 12 +/- 2 msec, respectively. The incidence of reinduced atrial flutter was 9 of 12 trials (P < or = 0.05 vs ibutilide) (7 nonsustained 57 +/- 7 sec duration, and 2 sustained). Sotalol failed to terminate atrial flutter in two dogs on days 1 and 5, despite increases in AFL CL (21 +/- 8 msec) and AERP (16 +/- 9 msec), whereas on day 3, ibutilide (20 +/- 7 micrograms/kg) terminated atrial flutter in those two dogs while increasing AFL CL and AERP 18 +/- 6 and 15 +/- 0 msec, respectively.

Conclusion: Both sotalol and ibutilide terminate atrial flutter in this model. Ibutilide converted atrial flutter in dogs in which sotalol was not successful. Following atrial flutter termination, ibutilide had a lower incidence of reinduced arrhythmias compared to sotalol. Ibutilide produced atrial antiarrhythmic effects while having no significant electrophysiologic effects on the ventricle.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Atrial Flutter / drug therapy*
  • Atrial Flutter / etiology
  • Atrial Flutter / physiopathology
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Dogs
  • Electrocardiography
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Male
  • Pericarditis / complications
  • Pericarditis / drug therapy*
  • Pericarditis / physiopathology
  • Sotalol / administration & dosage*
  • Sulfonamides / administration & dosage*
  • Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry / prevention & control*

Substances

  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
  • Sulfonamides
  • ibutilide
  • Sotalol