[Nosocomial infections in Germany. Their epidemiology in old and new Federal Länder]

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1996 Oct 18;121(42):1281-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1043140.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence rate of nosocomial infections in different parts of Germany.

Patients and methods: The study involved 14,966 patients (45.9% medical, 35.9% surgical, 14.7% obstetrical/gynaecological and 3.5% intensive care) in 72 randomly chosen German hospitals (59 in the old [i.e. previously West German] and 13 in the new [i.e. East German] Federal Lands). Using the CDC criteria for the diagnosis of nosocomial infections specially trained doctors determined whether the infection was in fact nosocomial.

Results: There was a 3.5% prevalence rate of nosocomial infections in the entire population (95% confidence interval 3.1-3.9%). In view of the chosen methods and the in part incorrect indication of microbiological diagnosis in the included hospital, this rate of nosocomial infection is likely to be a minimum number. The prevalence rate for the most important nosocomial infections was lower in the new Lands of Federal Germany than the older ones (total prevalence of 2.7 vs 3.6%). The difference is mainly due to the less frequent employment of various devices (e.g. peripheral vascular catheters), rather than different hygienic standards in their use.

Conclusion: The lower prevalence rate of nosocomial infections in the new Lands, because fewer devices are employed, underlines the need constantly to test the indications for their use.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Cross Infection / epidemiology*
  • Cross Infection / etiology
  • Female
  • Germany / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prevalence
  • Random Allocation
  • Research Design