Immediate early gene (IEG) expression in the cat visual cortex is highly responsive to visual input and may initiate genetic mechanisms responsible for neuronal plasticity. The present study used immunohistochemical methods to address two issues regarding IEG expression in response to visual input. One was to define the differential response of distinct IEG families by comparing EGR-1 (also termed zif-268, NGFI-A, and Krox-24) and Fos proteins. The second was to determine whether IEG expression, in addition to reflecting neural activity, is related to the state of plasticity by comparing young and adult visual cortex. Immunoreactivity of the two IEG proteins was compared between 5-week-old and adult cats under three conditions of visual input: ambient light to assess basal levels of expression, 1 week of darkness to assess the effect of reduced activity, and exposure to light after 1 week of darkness to determine rapid changes in expression as a result of visual input. At both ages, there were marked differences in the expression of the two IEG proteins. EGR-1 responded to visual input with sustained changes in its level of expression. It showed high basal levels, reduced expression in darkness, and a rapid return to high constitutive levels with the introduction of light. Fos showed a markedly different profile. It had very low basal expression which was not demonstrably affected by darkness and its principal response was a marked transient induction upon exposure to light after darkness. These unique changes in expression highlight the complex response across IEGs to environmental input and suggest a genetic "on/off' signaling mechanism. There were marked differences in the laminar distribution of EGR-1 and Fos proteins between young and adult cats. In young animals, cells in all visual cortical layers showed high levels of EGR-1 and Fos proteins. In adults, immunostaining was largely specific to cells located above and below layer IV and only very faint labeling occurred within layer IV. These differences in laminar distribution between ages are inconsistent with a simple explanation of IEG expression in terms of neural activity level; rather, they suggest a relation between IEG expression and the state of plasticity in visual cortex.