Piggy-back versus conventional technique in liver transplantation: report of a randomized trial

Transpl Int. 1997;10(2):109-12. doi: 10.1007/pl00003824.

Abstract

Liver transplantation with preservation of the recipient vena cava (the "piggy-back" technique) has been proposed as an alternative to the traditional method. We performed a randomized study on 39 cirrhotic patients, 20 who underwent the piggy-back technique (group 1) and 19 the traditional method using venovenous bypass (group 2) to evaluate the feasibility and true advantages of the piggy-back technique compared to the traditional method. Two patients were switched to the conventional technique due to the presence of a caudate lobe embracing the vena cava in one patient and a caval lesion in the other. Statistically significant differences between the two groups were only found for the warm ischemia time (48.5 +/- 13 min for piggy-back vs 60 +/- 12 min for the conventional method) and for renal failure (zero cases in group 1 vs four cases in group 2). We therefore believe that liver transplantation with the piggy-back technique can easily be performed in almost all cases, and that only a few, specific situations, such as a very enlarged caudate lobe, do not justify its routine use.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / surgery
  • Erythrocyte Transfusion
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Hemodynamics
  • Hepatolenticular Degeneration / surgery
  • Humans
  • Ischemia
  • Liver Cirrhosis / surgery
  • Liver Neoplasms / surgery
  • Liver Transplantation / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Organ Preservation