Aims: Prospectively to compare success rate and complications in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty using two doses of heparin.
Methods and results: Four hundred patients undergoing coronary angioplasty were randomly assigned to receive 15,000 IU (group A) or 100 IU.kg-1 (group B) of heparin. The angioplasty success rate was 95% of both groups. Stents were placed in 28.5% and 26.5% of patients in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.73). The primary endopoint (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization or bailout stenting) occurred in 91% vs 95% of patients in groups A and B, respectively (odds ratio: 1.88, 95% CI: 0.80-4.50, P = 0.12). Haemoglobin loss was 0.36 +/- 1 and 0.27 +/- 0.9 g.dl-1 in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.37). The time to sheath removal (735 +/- 265 vs 558 +/- 246 min) and the time to transfer to a stepdown unit (12.7 +/- 4.5 vs 9.8 +/- 4.2 h) were longer in groups A (P = 0.0001 for both comparisons).
Conclusion: A weight-adjusted low dose of intravenous heparin is at least as safe as a fixed high dose for coronary angioplasty. It allows earlier sheath removal and discharge to a stepdown unit.