[Comparison of scanners and porto-scanners, both in helical mode, for the study of hepatic metastases. Prospective study in 12 patients]

Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1997;21(4):254-8.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare helical CTAP and helical CT-scan in the preoperative assessment of liver metastases.

Methods: A prospective unicentric study in 12 patients was performed with helical CTAP and helical CT-scan. All patients underwent partial hepatectomy with intraoperative palpation and sonography within 19 days (mean: 9 days).

Results: Examination of resected liver specimens found 38 metastases, from colorectal cancer in 36 cases. The sensitivity was 92.1% for helical CTAP and 79% for helical CT-scan. This sensitivity was 85% for helical CTAP and 60% for helical CT-scan for nodules 1 cm or less in diameter (P = 0.08).

Conclusion: In the preoperative screening of liver metastases, helical CT-scan should be performed as the first choice examination. When hepatic lesions seem to be curable by resection based on helical dynamic CT-scan results, helical CTAP should be performed to increase the sensitivity of detection of lesions 1 cm or less in diameter.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Liver Neoplasms / secondary
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Portography / methods*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / pathology