Surgical management of brain-stem cavernomas

Neurosurg Rev. 1997;20(2):87-93. doi: 10.1007/BF01138189.

Abstract

We present a series of seven patients who were operated on for symptomatic brain-stem cavernomas. The following approaches were used: medial suboccipital (N = 4), lateral suboccipital (N = 1), subtemporal-transtentorial (N = 1), and frontal transcortical-transventricular-subchorioidal-trans velum interpositum (N = 1). Intraoperative motor (N = 4) and somatosensory (N = 1) evoked potential monitoring revealed temporary changes in 3 patients. Immediately postoperatively, the following additional deficits were observed in 6 patients: oculomotor nerve paresis (N = 2), abducens nerve paresis (N = 3), facial nerve paresis (N = 2), deafness (N = 1), and increased ataxia (N = 3). One patient died due to septic complications not related to surgery. After a mean observation time of 2 years, 2 patients had improved, 3 were unchanged, and 1 patient deteriorated as compared to his preoperative status. In conclusion, surgical treatment of brain-stem cavernomas, although carrying a significant risk of temporary neurological deterioration is recommended in symptomatic patients in whom the cavernoma seems to reach the surface of the brain-stem. Intraoperative functional topographic mapping and monitoring have proven useful tools lowering the surgical risks in these patients.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Brain Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Brain Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Brain Stem / pathology
  • Brain Stem / surgery*
  • Craniotomy / methods
  • Evoked Potentials, Motor / physiology
  • Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory / physiology
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hemangioma, Cavernous / diagnosis
  • Hemangioma, Cavernous / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Microsurgery / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Monitoring, Intraoperative
  • Neurologic Examination
  • Postoperative Complications / diagnosis
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed