Objectives: Two new methods for the detection of transitional tumor cells in bladder wash (karyometry: QUANTICYT) and voided urine material (BARD BTA test) were compared with bladder wash cytology for the prediction of histology and tumor recurrence.
Methods: Bladder wash material and voided urine were sampled from 138 patients. Bladder wash karyometric (BWK) image analysis and the BTA test were applied. A subsequent urethrocystoscopy was performed and a bladder tumor, when present, was resected. Moreover, each patient was followed for tumor recurrence and progression.
Results: Sensitivities for the detection of tumors were 34.4%, 44.8%, and 69.0% for the BTA test, bladder wash cytology (BWC), and BWK, respectively (BTA versus BWC, P = 0.64; BTA versus BWK, P = 0.0002; BWC versus BWK, P = 0.0001, using the McNemar test). Specificities for the different tests were 81.3%, 92.5%, and 72.5%, respectively (BTA versus BWC, P = 0.096; BTA versus BWK, P = 0.031; BWC versus BWK, P = 0.001, using the McNemar test). Combinations of tests did not result in better prediction of the presence of tumor. Sensitivity of carcinoma in situ for the three tests was 0 of 3, 3 of 3, and 3 of 3, respectively. Follow-up analysis after a negative cystoscopy revealed comparable predictive values for BWC and BWK.
Conclusions: The BTA test may be useful for patients with recurrent, low-grade papillary lesions. However, sensitivity for detection of these lesions, although higher than that for BWC, was only 42.9%. The highest specificity was found for BWC; however, this was accompanied by the lowest sensitivity of all three tests. The lower specificity of BWK was accompanied by a better prediction of tumor recurrence after a normal urethrocystoscopy. BWK is particularly sensitive for the recurrence of high-grade bladder lesions.