A prospective randomized study of anterior single-level cervical disc operations with long-term follow-up: surgical fusion is unnecessary

Neurosurgery. 1998 Jul;43(1):51-5. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199807000-00032.

Abstract

Objective: After 40 years of experience with anterior cervical operations, whether to fuse is still controversial. This study seeks to answer this question.

Methods: In this prospective randomized study, we operated on 91 patients with single-level cervical root compression using three different methods: 1) discectomy without fusion, 2) fusion with autologous bone graft, and 3) fusion with autologous bone graft plus plating.

Results: After 4 years of follow-up, the radiological results indicated that complete bony union was achieved in almost all cases. A slight kyphosis developed in 62.5% of the patients who had undergone discectomy, 40% of the patients who had undergone fusion, and 44% of the patients who had undergone fusion plus plating (not significant). The clinical outcomes were good for 76% of the patients who had undergone discectomy, 82% who had undergone fusion, and 73% who had undergone fusion plus plating. The outcomes were poor in 0, 4, and 4%, respectively (not significant).

Conclusion: According to this study, satisfactory results can be achieved by performing simple discectomy to treat single-level cervical root compressive disease.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Bone Plates
  • Bone Transplantation
  • Cervical Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Diskectomy
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement / diagnosis
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement / surgery*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myelography
  • Nerve Compression Syndromes / diagnosis
  • Nerve Compression Syndromes / surgery
  • Neurologic Examination
  • Postoperative Complications / diagnosis
  • Spinal Fusion*
  • Spinal Nerve Roots / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome