Reliability of routine clinical instruments for the assessment of Alzheimer's disease administered by telephone

J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1998 Spring;11(1):18-24. doi: 10.1177/089198879801100105.

Abstract

We investigated the reliability, using a telephone interview procedure, of cognitive, functional, and behavioral scales in an elderly population with normal aging and dementia. Two clinicians performed the assessments: one performed the assessments in a telephone interview format and the other conducted the assessments at the clinic. The telephone interview always preceded the clinic evaluation (2-30 days apart), and both clinicians were blind to any previous evaluations of the patient. The intraclass correlation coefficients between the telephone interview and the ratings obtained by a different clinician on the clinic evaluation varied between 0.92 and 0.98 (P's < or = .001) for comprehensive test scores. These results indicate that a telephone interview format, although not a substitute for a face-to-face diagnostic evaluation, is a reliable procedure for obtaining the assessment modalities studied. These findings are particularly important in aged and dementia research populations where personal contact may not always be feasible.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Alzheimer Disease / diagnosis*
  • Cognition Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Epidemiologic Methods
  • Female
  • Geriatric Assessment*
  • Humans
  • Interview, Psychological / methods
  • Interview, Psychological / standards*
  • Male
  • Neuropsychological Tests / standards
  • Observer Variation
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / standards
  • Remote Consultation / standards*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Severity of Illness Index