A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects

Pediatr Surg Int. 1998 Sep;13(7):487-90. doi: 10.1007/s003830050379.

Abstract

Large abdominal wall defects may require a prosthesis for closure. The aim of our study was to identify the best material for abdominoplasty in pediatric patients. One hundred twenty-eight Wistar KY strain male rats (3 weeks old) were used. All animals underwent celiotomy via a midline skin incision. They were divided into seven groups as follows: the animals in groups 1 through 6 underwent full-thickness abdominal wall excision 3 cm in diameter. The animals in group 1 underwent primary closure. In groups 2 through 6 the defect was closed with prosthetic material. In Group 7, a sham operation was performed. Daily weights were measured. The animals were killed after 3 and 9 weeks. Adhesion scores were assigned for each group. Vicryl mesh resulted in the fewest adhesions and had no effect on weight gain in the developing rats.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Muscles / abnormalities*
  • Abdominal Muscles / surgery*
  • Animals
  • Biocompatible Materials*
  • Male
  • Polyethylene Terephthalates
  • Polyethylenes
  • Polyglactin 910
  • Polypropylenes
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene
  • Rats
  • Rats, Inbred WKY
  • Surgical Mesh*
  • Tissue Adhesions / etiology
  • Weight Gain

Substances

  • Biocompatible Materials
  • Plastipore
  • Polyethylene Terephthalates
  • Polyethylenes
  • Polypropylenes
  • Polyglactin 910
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene