Posterior interosseous flap and its variations for coverage of hand wounds

J Trauma. 1998 Sep;45(3):570-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199809000-00027.

Abstract

Background: Conventional posterior interosseous flap has the disadvantage of partial or even complete necrosis of the flap when there is anatomical variation or contusion around its distal pedicle. To make it a more reliable flap, three types of auxiliary procedures were designed.

Methods: (1) When there is congestion after inset of the distally based flap, an additional venous anastomosis was carried out. (2) When there is anatomical variation so that a distally based flap could not be raised without compromising the nerve branches, or when contusion was found around the distal pedicle, the flap was changed into a free flap. This design is also indicated for coverage of the distal fingers. (3) When the patient is elderly with possible peripheral arterial disease, the flap was raised with a wide base, incorporating the branches of both the anterior and posterior interosseous arteries. There were eight, 36, and five patients in each group, respectively.

Results: There was only one failure in the free flap group. No partial necrosis of the flap was found. Other complications were analyzed.

Conclusion: With these backup procedures, the posterior interosseous flap can be more widely used with safety. By combining various reconstructive armaments, the result of a conventional procedure can be improved.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Child
  • Female
  • Hand Injuries / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Surgical Flaps / blood supply*
  • Treatment Outcome