Effects of ischemic preconditioning on myocardial perfusion, function, and microvascular regulation

Circulation. 1998 Nov 10;98(19 Suppl):II197-204; discussion II204-5.

Abstract

Background: Ischemic preconditioning (PC) has been advocated as a method to preserve myocardial function and perfusion during minimally invasive direct coronary bypass (MIDCAB). We examined the effects of PC on indexes of myocardial function, perfusion, and endothelial and beta-adrenergic coronary regulation after 30 minutes of ischemia and 60 minutes of reperfusion (IR).

Methods and results: Five groups of pigs were studied: (1) PC-IR: PC by 3 cycles of 5-minute left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion (CO) and 5-minute reperfusion (Rep) + 30 minutes of CO + 60 minutes of Rep; (2) IR alone: 30 minutes of CO + 60 minutes of Rep; (3) PC alone; (4) PC-IR-glibenclamide (GLIB): PC-IR + infusion of GLIB; (5) control: noninstrumented. Reactivity (in vitro) of coronary arterioles (70 to 150 microns) from the myocardial area at risk was examined with video microscopy. beta-Adrenergic microvascular relaxations to isoproterenol, forskolin, and 8-bromo-cAMP were significantly reduced after IR alone (P < 0.05 versus control, 2-way ANOVA). PC before IR restored these responses to normal (P < 0.05 PC-IR versus IR alone), and GLIB abolished this effect of PC. Subepicardial endothelium-dependent microvascular relaxation to ADP was significantly reduced after IR alone (P < 0.01 versus control) but was preserved in both the PC-IR and PC-IR-GLIB groups (P < 0.05 versus IR alone). The response of vessels to ADP from the subendocardium was significantly reduced in all groups compared with the control response (all P < 0.05 versus control). Nitroprusside elicited a similar response in vessels from all groups. PC before IR did not affect the reduced myocardial percent segmental shortening or left ventricular maximal dP/dt, did not affect myocardial perfusion in the subepicardium or subendocardium, and did not change expression of the inducible or the constitutively expressed isoforms of nitric oxide synthase.

Conclusions: PC before IR preserves beta-adrenergic signal transduction in coronary smooth muscle through a KATP channel mechanism, whereas PC preserves endothelium-dependent relaxation in the subepicardium through a mechanism not related to KATP channels or the enhanced expression of nitric oxide synthase. Nevertheless, PC does not improve short-term myocardial function or baseline myocardial perfusion after IR. Thus, the short-term beneficial role of PC in myocardial protection during MIDCAB may be limited.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adrenergic beta-Agonists / pharmacology
  • Animals
  • Coronary Circulation / drug effects
  • Coronary Circulation / physiology*
  • Coronary Vessels / physiopathology
  • Endothelial Growth Factors / genetics
  • Female
  • Heart / physiopathology
  • Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial*
  • Lymphokines / genetics
  • Male
  • Microcirculation / drug effects
  • Microcirculation / physiology
  • Nitric Oxide Synthase / genetics
  • Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II
  • Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III
  • RNA, Messenger / metabolism
  • Swine
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors
  • Vasoconstriction / physiology
  • Vasodilator Agents / pharmacology

Substances

  • Adrenergic beta-Agonists
  • Endothelial Growth Factors
  • Lymphokines
  • RNA, Messenger
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors
  • Vasodilator Agents
  • Nitric Oxide Synthase
  • Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II
  • Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III