Page RA - Search Results

1

When to approach novel prey cues? Social learning strategies in frog-eating bats.

Jones PL, Ryan MJ, Flores V, Page RA. Jones PL, et al. Among authors: page ra. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 7;280(1772):20132330. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2330. Proc Biol Sci. 2013. PMID: 24266035 Free PMC article.

2

Flexibility in assessment of prey cues: frog-eating bats and frog calls.

Page RA, Ryan MJ. Page RA, et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 22;272(1565):841-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2998. Proc Biol Sci. 2005. PMID: 15888417 Free PMC article.

3

Social transmission of novel foraging behavior in bats: frog calls and their referents.

Page RA, Ryan MJ. Page RA, et al. Curr Biol. 2006 Jun 20;16(12):1201-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.038. Curr Biol. 2006. PMID: 16782010 Free article.

4

Cues for eavesdroppers: do frog calls indicate prey density and quality?

Bernal XE, Page RA, Rand AS, Ryan MJ. Bernal XE, et al. Among authors: page ra. Am Nat. 2007 Mar;169(3):409-15. doi: 10.1086/510729. Epub 2007 Jan 11. Am Nat. 2007. PMID: 17230403

5

Acoustic radiation patterns of mating calls of the tungara frog (Physalaemus pustuosus): implications for multiple receivers.

Bernal XE, Page RA, Ryan MJ, Argo TF, Wilson PS. Bernal XE, et al. Among authors: page ra. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Nov;126(5):2757-67. doi: 10.1121/1.3212929. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009. PMID: 19894851

6

Signal perception in frogs and bats and the evolution of mating signals.

Akre KL, Farris HE, Lea AM, Page RA, Ryan MJ. Akre KL, et al. Among authors: page ra. Science. 2011 Aug 5;333(6043):751-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1205623. Science. 2011. PMID: 21817052 Free PMC article.

7

Do frog-eating bats perceptually bind the complex components of frog calls?

Jones PL, Farris HE, Ryan MJ, Page RA. Jones PL, et al. Among authors: page ra. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2013 Apr;199(4):279-83. doi: 10.1007/s00359-012-0791-5. Epub 2013 Jan 16. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2013. PMID: 23322446

8

Risky ripples allow bats and frogs to eavesdrop on a multisensory sexual display.

Halfwerk W, Jones PL, Taylor RC, Ryan MJ, Page RA. Halfwerk W, et al. Among authors: page ra. Science. 2014 Jan 24;343(6169):413-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1244812. Science. 2014. PMID: 24458640

9

Crossmodal comparisons of signal components allow for relative-distance assessment.

Halfwerk W, Page RA, Taylor RC, Wilson PS, Ryan MJ. Halfwerk W, et al. Among authors: page ra. Curr Biol. 2014 Aug 4;24(15):1751-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.068. Epub 2014 Jul 17. Curr Biol. 2014. PMID: 25042586 Free article.

10

Risks of multimodal signaling: bat predators attend to dynamic motion in frog sexual displays.

Halfwerk W, Dixon MM, Ottens KJ, Taylor RC, Ryan MJ, Page RA, Jones PL. Halfwerk W, et al. Among authors: page ra. J Exp Biol. 2014 Sep 1;217(Pt 17):3038-44. doi: 10.1242/jeb.107482. J Exp Biol. 2014. PMID: 25165134

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

113 results

Search Page

Filters