Bahl M - Search Results

1

Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography.

Bahl M, Lamb LR, Lehman CD. Bahl M, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov;209(5):1162-1167. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17979. Epub 2017 Aug 23. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. PMID: 28834441

2

Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound in Female Patients With Nipple Discharge.

Bahl M, Baker JA, Greenup RA, Ghate SV. Bahl M, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul;205(1):203-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13354. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015. PMID: 26102400

3

Architectural Distortion on Mammography: Correlation With Pathologic Outcomes and Predictors of Malignancy.

Bahl M, Baker JA, Kinsey EN, Ghate SV. Bahl M, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Dec;205(6):1339-45. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14628. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015. PMID: 26587943

4

Reply to "Conventional Ductography Combined With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Imaging of Pathologic Nipple Discharge".

Bahl M, Baker JA, Ghate SV. Bahl M, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Feb;206(2):W45. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15606. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016. PMID: 26797381 No abstract available.

5

JOURNAL CLUB: Diagnostic Utility of MRI After Negative or Inconclusive Mammography for the Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge.

Bahl M, Gadd MA, Lehman CD. Bahl M, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Dec;209(6):1404-1410. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18139. Epub 2017 Sep 12. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. PMID: 28898125

6

High-Risk Breast Lesions: A Machine Learning Model to Predict Pathologic Upgrade and Reduce Unnecessary Surgical Excision.

Bahl M, Barzilay R, Yedidia AB, Locascio NJ, Yu L, Lehman CD. Bahl M, et al. Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):810-818. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170549. Epub 2017 Oct 17. Radiology. 2018. PMID: 29039725

7

Flat Epithelial Atypia: Upgrade Rates and Risk-Stratification Approach to Support Informed Decision Making.

Lamb LR, Bahl M, Gadd MA, Lehman CD. Lamb LR, et al. Among authors: bahl m. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Dec;225(6):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Oct 31. J Am Coll Surg. 2017. PMID: 29100673

8

Breast Cancer Characteristics Associated with 2D Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening-detected and Interval Cancers.

Bahl M, Gaffney S, McCarthy AM, Lowry KP, Dang PA, Lehman CD. Bahl M, et al. Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):49-57. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171148. Epub 2017 Dec 22. Radiology. 2018. PMID: 29272213

9

Pathologic Upgrade Rates of High-Risk Breast Lesions on Digital Two-Dimensional vs Tomosynthesis Mammography.

Lamb LR, Bahl M, Hughes KS, Lehman CD. Lamb LR, et al. Among authors: bahl m. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 May;226(5):858-867. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.049. Epub 2018 Feb 2. J Am Coll Surg. 2018. PMID: 29410346

10

Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.

Bahl M, Mercaldo S, Vijapura CA, McCarthy AM, Lehman CD. Bahl M, et al. Eur Radiol. 2019 Feb;29(2):477-484. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5596-7. Epub 2018 Jul 2. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 29967957

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

239 results

Search Page

Filters