Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

360 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Publication Date timeline is not available.
Page 1
The WHICH? trial: rationale and design of a pragmatic randomized, multicentre comparison of home- vs. clinic-based management of chronic heart failure patients.
Stewart S, Carrington MJ, Marwick T, Davidson PM, Macdonald P, Horowitz J, Krum H, Newton PJ, Reid C, Scuffham PA; Which Heart failure Intervention is most Cost-effective & consumer friendly in reducing Hospital care trial Investigators. Stewart S, et al. Among authors: scuffham pa. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Aug;13(8):909-16. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr048. Epub 2011 May 26. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011. PMID: 21616952 Free article. Clinical Trial.
Navigating the fine line between benefit and risk in chronic atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of the Standard versus Atrial Fibrillation spEcific managemenT studY (SAFETY).
Carrington MJ, Ball J, Horowitz JD, Marwick TH, Mahadevan G, Wong C, Abhayaratna WP, Haluska B, Thompson DR, Scuffham PA, Stewart S. Carrington MJ, et al. Among authors: scuffham pa. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jun 20;166(2):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.065. Epub 2011 Nov 12. Int J Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 22079383 Clinical Trial.
Impact of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: the WHICH? (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care) multicenter, randomized trial.
Stewart S, Carrington MJ, Marwick TH, Davidson PM, Macdonald P, Horowitz JD, Krum H, Newton PJ, Reid C, Chan YK, Scuffham PA. Stewart S, et al. Among authors: scuffham pa. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 2;60(14):1239-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.025. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 23017533 Free article. Clinical Trial.
A multicenter, randomized trial of a nurse-led, home-based intervention for optimal secondary cardiac prevention suggests some benefits for men but not for women: the Young at Heart study.
Carrington MJ, Chan YK, Calderone A, Scuffham PA, Esterman A, Goldstein S, Stewart S; Young at Heart Investigators. Carrington MJ, et al. Among authors: scuffham pa. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jul;6(4):379-89. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000006. Epub 2013 Jul 2. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013. PMID: 23819955 Clinical Trial.
Prolonged impact of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort.
Stewart S, Carrington MJ, Horowitz JD, Marwick TH, Newton PJ, Davidson PM, Macdonald P, Thompson DR, Chan YK, Krum H, Reid C, Scuffham PA. Stewart S, et al. Among authors: scuffham pa. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;174(3):600-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.164. Epub 2014 Apr 22. Int J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24825029 Clinical Trial.
360 results