Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

350 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Publication Date timeline is not available.
Page 1
Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.
Tosteson AN, Stout NK, Fryback DG, Acharyya S, Herman BA, Hannah LG, Pisano ED; DMIST Investigators. Tosteson AN, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 1;148(1):1-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18166758 Free PMC article.
Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.
Tosteson AN, Fryback DG, Hammond CS, Hanna LG, Grove MR, Brown M, Wang Q, Lindfors K, Pisano ED. Tosteson AN, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):954-61. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.981. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24756610 Free PMC article.
Breast cancer screening in an era of personalized regimens: a conceptual model and National Cancer Institute initiative for risk-based and preference-based approaches at a population level.
Onega T, Beaber EF, Sprague BL, Barlow WE, Haas JS, Tosteson AN, D Schnall M, Armstrong K, Schapira MM, Geller B, Weaver DL, Conant EF. Onega T, et al. Cancer. 2014 Oct 1;120(19):2955-64. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28771. Epub 2014 May 15. Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24830599 Free PMC article. Review.
Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
Stout NK, Lee SJ, Schechter CB, Kerlikowske K, Alagoz O, Berry D, Buist DS, Cevik M, Chisholm G, de Koning HJ, Huang H, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Munsell MF, Trentham-Dietz A, van Ravesteyn NT, Tosteson AN, Mandelblatt JS. Stout NK, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 28;106(6):dju092. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju092. Print 2014 Jun. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014. PMID: 24872543 Free PMC article.
Advanced Breast Imaging Availability by Screening Facility Characteristics.
Lee CI, Bogart A, Hubbard RA, Obadina ET, Hill DA, Haas JS, Tosteson AN, Alford-Teaster JA, Sprague BL, DeMartini WB, Lehman CD, Onega TL. Lee CI, et al. Acad Radiol. 2015 Jul;22(7):846-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Apr 4. Acad Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25851643 Free PMC article.
Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium.
Conant EF, Beaber EF, Sprague BL, Herschorn SD, Weaver DL, Onega T, Tosteson AN, McCarthy AM, Poplack SP, Haas JS, Armstrong K, Schnall MD, Barlow WE. Conant EF, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Feb;156(1):109-16. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3695-1. Epub 2016 Mar 1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016. PMID: 26931450 Free PMC article.
350 results