Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

160 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Publication Date timeline is not available.
Page 1
Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.
Roberts K, Mills N, Metcalfe C, Lane A, Clement C, Hollingworth W, Taylor J, Holcombe C, Skillman J, Fairhurst K, Whisker L, Cutress R, Thrush S, Fairbrother P, Potter S. Roberts K, et al. Among authors: holcombe c. BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e050886. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050886. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34848516 Free PMC article.
Response to: Gschwantler-Kaulich et al (2016) Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction - A prospective randomized trial doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.007.
Potter S, Holcombe C, Blazeby J; iBRA Research Collaborative. Potter S, et al. Among authors: holcombe c. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;42(11):1767-1768. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.05.041. Epub 2016 Jun 24. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27424788 No abstract available.
The iBRA-2 (immediate breast reconstruction and adjuvant therapy audit) study: protocol for a prospective national multicentre cohort study to evaluate the impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the delivery of adjuvant therapy.
Dave R, O'Connell R, Rattay T, Tolkien Z, Barnes N, Skillman J, Williamson P, Conroy E, Gardiner M, Harnett A, O'Brien C, Blazeby J, Potter S, Holcombe C; Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative. Dave R, et al. Among authors: holcombe c. BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 7;6(10):e012678. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012678. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27855106 Free PMC article.
The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction.
Potter S, Conroy EJ, Williamson PR, Thrush S, Whisker LJ, Skillman JM, Barnes NL, Cutress RI, Teasdale EM, Mills N, Mylvaganam S, Branford OA, McEvoy K, Jain A, Gardiner MD, Blazeby JM, Holcombe C; Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative. Potter S, et al. Among authors: holcombe c. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Aug 4;2:41. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0085-8. eCollection 2016. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016. PMID: 27965859 Free PMC article.
Results from the BRIOS randomised trial.
Potter S, Wilson RL, Harvey J, Holcombe C, Kirwan CC. Potter S, et al. Among authors: holcombe c. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Apr;18(4):e189. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30164-X. Lancet Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28368251 No abstract available.
Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire.
Mylvaganam S, Conroy E, Williamson PR, Barnes NLP, Cutress RI, Gardiner MD, Jain A, Skillman JM, Thrush S, Whisker LJ, Blazeby JM, Potter S, Holcombe C; iBRA Steering Group; Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative. Mylvaganam S, et al. Among authors: holcombe c. Breast. 2017 Oct;35:182-190. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 30. Breast. 2017. PMID: 28768227 Free PMC article.
160 results