Landsberger DM - Search Results

1

Stimulating the Cochlear Apex Without Longer Electrodes: Preliminary Results With a New Approach.

Landsberger DM, Stupak N, Spitzer ER, Entwisle L, Mahoney L, Waltzman SB, McMenomey S, Friedmann DR, Svirsky MA, Shapiro W, Roland JT Jr. Landsberger DM, et al. Otol Neurotol. 2022 Jun 1;43(5):e578-e581. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003529. Epub 2022 Mar 10. Otol Neurotol. 2022. PMID: 35283466 Free PMC article.

2

Perceptual differences between low and high rates of stimulation on single electrodes for cochlear implantees.

Landsberger DM, McKay CM. Landsberger DM, et al. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Jan;117(1):319-27. doi: 10.1121/1.1830672. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005. PMID: 15704424

3

Frequency-place map for electrical stimulation in cochlear implants: Change over time.

Vermeire K, Landsberger DM, Van de Heyning PH, Voormolen M, Kleine Punte A, Schatzer R, Zierhofer C. Vermeire K, et al. Among authors: landsberger dm. Hear Res. 2015 Aug;326:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 1. Hear Res. 2015. PMID: 25840373 Free PMC article.

4

The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.

Landsberger DM, Svrakic M, Roland JT Jr, Svirsky M. Landsberger DM, et al. Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):e207-13. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000163. Ear Hear. 2015. PMID: 25860624 Free PMC article.

5

Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.

Landsberger DM, Vermeire K, Claes A, Van Rompaey V, Van de Heyning P. Landsberger DM, et al. Ear Hear. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):e149-59. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000250. Ear Hear. 2016. PMID: 26583480 Free PMC article.

6

Reduction in spread of excitation from current focusing at multiple cochlear locations in cochlear implant users.

Padilla M, Landsberger DM. Padilla M, et al. Among authors: landsberger dm. Hear Res. 2016 Mar;333:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Jan 8. Hear Res. 2016. PMID: 26778546 Free PMC article.

7

Clinically Paired Electrodes Are Often Not Perceived as Pitch Matched.

Aronoff JM, Padilla M, Stelmach J, Landsberger DM. Aronoff JM, et al. Among authors: landsberger dm. Trends Hear. 2016 Sep 18;20:2331216516668302. doi: 10.1177/2331216516668302. Trends Hear. 2016. PMID: 27641682 Free PMC article.

8

Pitch ranking with different virtual channel configurations in electrical hearing.

Padilla M, Stupak N, Landsberger DM. Padilla M, et al. Among authors: landsberger dm. Hear Res. 2017 May;348:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Feb 17. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 28216122

9

Spectral-Temporal Modulated Ripple Discrimination by Children With Cochlear Implants.

Landsberger DM, Padilla M, Martinez AS, Eisenberg LS. Landsberger DM, et al. Ear Hear. 2018 Jan/Feb;39(1):60-68. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000463. Ear Hear. 2018. PMID: 28682810 Free PMC article.

10

Determining the minimum number of electrodes that need to be pitch matched to accurately estimate pitch matches across the array.

Stelmach J, Landsberger DM, Padilla M, Aronoff JM. Stelmach J, et al. Among authors: landsberger dm. Int J Audiol. 2017 Nov;56(11):894-899. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1346302. Epub 2017 Jul 12. Int J Audiol. 2017. PMID: 28697658 Free PMC article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

54 results

Search Page

Filters