Every Thursday, everyone at SentiLink drops what they're doing and spends an hour manually reviewing fraud cases.
This includes all ~100 of us--not just our Fraud Intelligence Team, but also our engineers, sales team, accountants, recruiters... even our CEO.
Each week has a "theme": we've explored scams, business takeovers, synthetic identities, deceased individuals, and more.
But why do we invest so much time into this? Why constantly pull everyone away from their work to manually label just a tiny subset of the million transactions our products help automatically decision each day?
We do fraud patrol because we believe that the only way to build great fraud products is to truly understand fraud. And we believe the only way to really understand fraud is to dive deep into fraud cases.
In fact, this belief is so core to us that we made Deep Understanding one of our four corporate values.
And now you can ride along and review fraud cases with us too. Sign up here and we'll walk through some fraud cases with you! https://lnkd.in/exs6NSSF
Senior strategy professional
1moGreat read and perspective. The point about GenAI having limited impact on the creation of synthetic IDs in the US due to the construct of these makes total sense, but do you think this is the same in other jurisdictions? We're anecdotally hearing of a significant rise in synthetic ID fraud in Europe for example and many banks are getting nervous.