On a conjecture about pattern avoidance of cycle permutations

Let $S_{n}$ denote the symmetric group on $[n]=\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$. It is well-known that every permutation $\pi$ in $S_{n}$ can be written either in its cycle form as a product of disjoint cycles or in its one-line notation as $\pi=\pi_{1}\pi_{2}\cdots\pi_{n}$, where $\pi_{i}=\pi(i)$ for all $i\in[n]$. If $\pi$ is composed of a single $n$-cycle, then $\pi$ is called a cycle permutation. Let $\pi=\pi_{1}\pi_{2}\cdots\pi_{n}\in S_{n}$ and $\tau=\tau_{1}\tau_{2}\cdots\tau_{k}\in S_{k}$ with $k\leq n$. If there exists a subset of indices $1\leq i_{1}<i_{2}<\cdot\cdot\cdot<i_{k}\leq n$ such that $\pi_{i_{s}}>\pi_{i_{t}}$ if and only if $\tau_{s}>\tau_{t}$ for all $1\leq s<t\leq k$, then we say that $\tau$ is contained in $\pi$ and the subsequence $\pi_{i_{1}}\pi_{i_{2}}\cdot\cdot\cdot\pi_{i_{k}}$ is called an occurrence of $\tau$ in $\pi$ and denoted by $\tau\leq\pi$. For example, $132\leq 24153$, because $2,~{}5,~{}3$ appear in the same order of size as the letters in $132$. The theory of pattern avoidance in permutations was introduced by Knuth in [10], which has been widely studied for half a century, refer to [5, 14]. A lot of attention has been given to the concept of pattern avoidance over the years. Some interesting and relevant results regarding pattern avoidance can be found in [3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13].

Let $\pi$ be a cycle permutation in $S_{n}$. Thereby, $\pi$ can be expressed one-line notation and cycle form as $\pi=\pi_{1}\pi_{2}\cdot\cdot\cdot\pi_{n}$ and $\pi=(c_{1},c_{2},...,c_{n})$, respectively. In particular, $\pi$ can also be written $\pi=(c_{i},c_{i+1},...,c_{n},c_{1},c_{2},...,c_{i-1})$ for each $1\leq i\leq n$; if $c_{i}=1$ then we call $(c_{i},c_{i+1},...,c_{n},c_{1},c_{2},...,c_{i-1})$ is the standard cycle form of $\pi$. Archer et al. [1] introduced the notion of pattern avoidance of one-line and standard cycle form for a cycle permutation, that is, if $\pi_{1}\pi_{2}\cdot\cdot\cdot\pi_{n}$ avoids $\sigma$ and $c_{i}c_{i+1}\cdot\cdot\cdot c_{n}c_{1}c_{2}\cdot\cdot\cdot c_{i-1}$ avoids $\tau$, then $\pi$ avoids $\sigma$ in its one-line form and avoids $\tau$ in its standard cycle form. Archer et al. [2] defined the notion of pattern avoidance of one-line and all cycle forms for a cycle permutation, namely, if $\pi_{1}\pi_{2}\cdot\cdot\cdot\pi_{n}$ avoids $\sigma$ and $c_{i}c_{i+1}\cdot\cdot\cdot c_{n}c_{1}c_{2}\cdot\cdot\cdot c_{i-1}$ avoids $\tau$ for each $1\leq i\leq n$, then $\pi$ avoids $\sigma$ in its one-line form and avoids $\tau$ in its all cycle forms. Let $\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(\sigma;\tau)$ denote the set of cyclic permutations in $S_{n}$ that avoid $\sigma$ in their one-line form and avoid $\tau$ in their all cycle forms. Archer et al. [2] proposed an interesting conjecture about $\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(\sigma;\tau)$, as follows:

In this paper, we prove that the Conjecture 1.1 is true, and so we obtain the following theorem.

It is well-known that the Pell numbers are defined by $P_{0}=0$ and $P_{1}=1$, and the recurrence relation $P_{n}=2P_{(n-1)}+P_{(n-2)}$ for $n\geq 2$. Moreover, one easily checks that $\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{1}(2431;1324)\Big{|}=0$ and $\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{2}(2431;1324)\Big{|}=1$ and $\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{3}(2431;1324)\Big{|}=2$ and $\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{4}(2431;1324)\Big{|}=5$. Thus, we see that the Theorem 1.2 holds for $n=1,2,3,4$. So we shall prove the Theorem 1.2 by induction on $n$. In other words, it suffices to prove $\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(2431;1324)\Big{|}=2\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n-1}(2431;1324)\Big{|}+\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n-2}(2431;1324)\Big{|}$ for $n\geq 5$. Next we start by providing an useful fact that has been pointed out in [2].

Base on the Fact 2.1, we define

$$\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(\sigma;\tau)\big{|}_{2}^{j}=\Big{\{}\pi\in\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(\sigma;\tau)\Big{|}\pi=(1,c_{2},...,c_{j-1},2,c_{j+1},...,c_{n})\Big{\}}.$$

Thereby, we have

$$\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(\sigma;\tau)\Big{|}=\sum_{j=2}^{n}\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(\sigma;\tau)\big{|}_{2}^{j}\Big{|}.$$

(2.1)

Consider $\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{j}\Big{|}$ for $2<j<n$. By Fact 2.1, we see that every $\pi\in\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{j}$ can be expressed as $(1,c_{2},...,c_{j-1},2,3,...,n-j+2)$. For convenience, we set $m=n-j+1$. Now we define a mapping $\mathit{g}$ by the rule that

$$\mathit{g}:(1,c_{2},...,c_{j-1},2,3,...,m,m+1)\mapsto(1,c_{2}-m,...,c_{j-1}-m).$$

Next we prove that $\mathit{g}$ is a bijection from $\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{j}$ to $\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{j-1}(2431;1324)$. Firstly, we prove that the definition of this mapping is reasonable. Clearly, $(1,c_{2}-m,...,c_{j-1}-m)$ avoids $1324$ in its all cycle forms. So it suffices to prove that $(1,c_{2}-m,...,c_{j-1}-m)$ avoids $2431$ in its one-line form. Let $(1,c_{2},...,c_{j-1},2,3,...,m,m+1)=\pi_{1}3\cdot\cdot\cdot(m+1)1\pi_{m+2}\cdot\cdot\cdot\pi_{n}$. Note that $\pi_{c_{j-1}}=2$ and if $c_{1}=1$ then $\pi_{c_{i}}=c_{i+1}$ for $1\leq i<j-1$. Taking

$$\pi^{\prime}=(\pi_{1}-m)(\pi_{m+2}-m)\cdot\cdot\cdot(\pi_{c_{j-1}-1}-m)(\pi_{c_{j-1}}-1)(\pi_{c_{j-1}+1}-m)\cdot\cdot\cdot(\pi_{n}-m).$$

Obviously, $\pi^{\prime}$ avoids $2431$ in its one-line form. Moreover, we see that $\pi^{\prime}(1)=\pi_{1}-m=c_{2}-m$ and $\pi^{\prime}(c_{i}-m)=\pi_{c_{i}}-m=c_{i+1}-m$ for $2\leq i<j-1$. Note $\pi^{\prime}(c_{j-1}-m)=\pi_{c_{j}-1}-1=1$ and thus $\pi^{\prime}=(1,c_{2}-m,...,c_{j-1}-m)$. Therefore, the definition of this mapping is reasonable. In addition, it is clear that $\mathit{g}$ is an injection, and it can be shown that $\mathit{g}$ is surjection by the same method. Thereby, $\mathit{g}$ is a bijection and so $\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{j}\Big{|}=\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{j-1}(2431;1324)\Big{|}$. The proof of this lemma is completed. $\Box$

According to equation (2.1) and Lemma 2.2, we deduce that for $n\geq 5$,

$$\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(2431;1324)\Big{|}=\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\Big{|}+\sum_{j=2}^{n-1}\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{j}(2431;1324)\Big{|}$$

and

$$\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n-1}(2431;1324)\Big{|}=\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n-1}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\Big{|}+\sum_{j=2}^{n-2}\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{j}(2431;1324)\Big{|}.$$

Thereby, we deduce that

$$\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(2431;1324)\Big{|}=2\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n-1}(2431;1324)\Big{|}+\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\Big{|}-\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n-1}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\Big{|}.$$

So far, we have seen that it suffices to prove

$$\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\Big{|}-\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n-1}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\Big{|}=\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n-2}(2431;1324)\Big{|}.$$

Inspired by Lemma 2.2, we define

$$\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(\sigma;\tau)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\big{|}_{3}^{j}=\Big{\{}\pi\in\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(\sigma;\tau)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\Big{|}\pi=(1,2,c_{3},...,c_{j-1},3,c_{j+1},...,c_{n})\Big{\}}.$$

Thereby, we have

$$\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(\sigma;\tau)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\Big{|}=\sum_{j=3}^{n}\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(\sigma;\tau)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\big{|}_{3}^{j}\Big{|}.$$

(2.2)

Next we consider $\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\big{|}_{3}^{j}$ in three situations.

According to equation (2.2) and Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 2.4 and Lemma 2.5, we deduce that

$$\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\Big{|}-\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n-1}(2431;1324)\big{|}_{2}^{2}\Big{|}=\Big{|}\mathcal{A}^{\circ}_{n-2}(2431;1324)\Big{|}.$$

Up to now we have completed the proof of Theorem 1.2.