Cost-effectiveness analysis of a home-based social work intervention for children and adolescents who have deliberately poisoned themselves. Results of a randomised controlled trial

Br J Psychiatry. 1999 Jan:174:56-62. doi: 10.1192/bjp.174.1.56.

Abstract

Background: Little evidence exists regarding the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of alternative treatment services in the field of child and adolescent psychiatry.

Aims: To assess the cost-effectiveness of a home-based social work intervention for young people who have deliberately poisoned themselves.

Method: Children aged < or = 16 years, referred to child mental health teams with a diagnosis of deliberate self-poisoning were randomly allocated to either routine care (n = 77) or routine care plus the social work intervention (n = 85). Clinical and resource-use data were assessed over six months from the date of trial entry.

Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the main outcome measures or costs. In a sub-group of children without major depression, suicidal ideation was significantly lower in the intervention group at the six-month follow-up (P = 0.01), with no significant differences in cost.

Conclusions: A family-based social work intervention for children and adolescents who have deliberately poisoned themselves is as cost-effective as routine care alone.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • England
  • Health Care Costs
  • Home Care Services / economics*
  • Humans
  • Poisoning / economics*
  • Poisoning / therapy
  • Prognosis
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Social Work / economics*
  • State Medicine / economics
  • Suicide, Attempted