Can the decision to operate be judged retrospectively? A study of medical records

Eur J Surg. 1999 Jun;165(6):516-21. doi: 10.1080/110241599750006389.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the precision and completeness of information in medical records for evaluating the appropriateness of operative indications for lumbar disc surgery.

Design: Retrospective review of records.

Setting: University department of neurosurgery, Switzerland.

Subject: 100 patients.

Interventions: None.

Main outcome measures: Proportion of pre-defined, detailed appropriateness criteria present in the records. Proportion of cases that could unequivocally be classified as to the appropriateness of the indication for operation.

Results: The criteria were present and precise for 52 of the items (range 9-90); present but imprecise for 38 of the items, and absent for 10. Because of this imprecision, the appropriateness of only 7 of the operative indications could be unequivocally assessed retrospectively.

Conclusion: Medical records are of limited use in assessing the appropriate management of care. The process of care should therefore be evaluated prospectively.

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement / epidemiology
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement / surgery*
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Male
  • Medical Records
  • Middle Aged
  • Process Assessment, Health Care / methods*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surgical Procedures, Operative* / statistics & numerical data