Purpose: The purpose of this work was to estimate the population pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer using circadian change kinetics.
Methods: Eighty-five patients (32 females, 53 males) were enrolled onto this study. All patients received folinic acid (200 mg/m(2)) by intravenous infusion over 2 h followed by a 5-FU loading dose (400 mg/m(2)) and then continuous infusion (600 mg/m(2)) for 22 h. This whole regimen was repeated on day 2 and was given on a 14-day cycle. Plasma 5-FU determinations were performed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet absorbance detection. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using the NONMEM computer program through the Visual-NM graphical interface. An open one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with zero-order input rate was used to describe the kinetics of 5-FU; moreover, circadian time-dependent changes in 5-FU concentrations were taken into account in the model. The circadian model was defined as the sum of two cyclic components; the amplitude of the first cyclic component (over 24 h) was about 30% of the average clearance and the amplitude of the second cyclic component (over 12 h) was about 50% of the amplitude of the first component. The acrophase (peak) times of the first and the second periodic component were 04 h 12 m and 00 h 25 m, respectively. The potential sources of variability on the population parameters (65 patients) were investigated using patient's sex, body area, age, body weight, height, liver enzymes and serum creatinine as covariables.
Results: Only the estimated clearance circadian changes were different for the two sexes. The population parameter estimates of mean clearance (CL(mean)) and initial volume of distribution (V), were as follows: the male subgroup showed a CL(mean) value twice larger (125 l/h) than the value observed in the female subgroup (65 l/h), and V = 21 l. A validation group of 20 additional patients was used to evaluate the predictive performances of the population parameters. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters were computed by means of a Bayesian fitting procedure. From the resulting individualized parameter values, concentrations of 5-FU in the plasma were calculated. To evaluate the performance of the Bayesian estimation, the experimental concentrations were compared with the predicted ones.
Conclusion: In conclusion, a chronomodulated delivery schedule of 5-FU should be performed, using a perfusion rate inversely proportional to the circadian variations of clearance in order to maintain stable 5-FU plasma levels. Such a treatment schedule may result in increased effectiveness of the treatment and decreased occurrence of drug-associated side-effects. The present study develops a complete procedure to efficiently estimate 5-FU clearance in order to optimize dosage regimens in individual patients.