Comparison of methods for assessing nutritional status in HIV-infected adults

Nutrition. 1999 Oct;15(10):740-3. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(99)00146-x.

Abstract

Malnutrition is a frequent complication of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and is associated with a poor prognosis. To compare different measures of nutritional status in HIV-infected patients, we prospectively studied 88 outpatients seen at a Paris AIDS outpatient clinic for routine follow-up examinations. Nutritional status was assessed according to body weight loss (BWL, 4 classes), anthropometry, bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA), and subjective global assessment of nutritional status (SGA). Malnutrition was diagnosed in 22.4% of subjects using SGA, and 37.1% by BWL. SGA rapidly detected a worsening of nutritional status, while BWL detected malnutrition at an earlier stage. A good correlation was found between SGA class and body composition assessed by anthropometry and BIA. Deteriorating nutritional status diagnosed by SGA correlated with the CDC HIV disease class. SGA, a simple nutritional assessment, can serve as a basis for prescribing artificial nutrition, while BWL detects malnutrition at an earlier stage.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome / complications*
  • Adult
  • Anthropometry
  • Body Composition
  • Electric Impedance
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Nutrition Disorders / complications
  • Nutrition Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Nutritional Status*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Weight Loss