Assessing head and neck cancer patient outcome domains

Head Neck. 2000 Jan;22(1):6-11. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(200001)22:1<6::aid-hed2>3.0.co;2-p.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the relative importance on patients' lives of multiple outcomes resulting from the management of head and neck cancer (HNC).

Methods: HNC patients filled out a disease-specific quality of life (QOL) survey covering 5 domains (speech, eating, aesthetics, pain/discomfort, and social/role functioning). Logistic regression was used to determine which of these domains best predicted the patients' response to a single, overall QOL assessment.

Results: In univariate analyses, all 5 domains were significantly correlated to QOL (p<.0001), with correlation coefficients ranging from.48 for eating to.64 for social/role functioning. Logistic regression indicated that speech and eating best predicted QOL (R(2) =.4647), with odds-ratios of 2. 96 for speech and 2.49 for eating.

Conclusions: These data demonstrated that, for this group of patients, speech has the most impact on well-being, whereas eating has a substantial, unrelated influence. This is important information in counseling patients about treatment plans that have different levels of impairment.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living*
  • Adaptation, Psychological
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Eating
  • Esthetics
  • Female
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms / rehabilitation
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Interpersonal Relations
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life*
  • Sampling Studies
  • Speech
  • Treatment Outcome